You don’t know
the half of it, like the old folks used to say
but the half
of it is what I do know
What I don’t
know is the other
- Lucille Clifton, “God Bless America”
As 2013 drew closer,
reminders of the year(s) past were everywhere.
Among the well-rehearsed stories brought to our attention was one which,
yet again, described the complexities of the U.S. population – not only is it
changing, but now changing more rapidly and noticeably. Pundits tell us that a glaring example of this
change was seen in the unwillingness or inability of many political candidates
to see and hear the needs, ideas and beliefs of their constituents. Defeated candidates were - it’s been said -
out of touch with the future of America;
their message was shaped by and to voters that are or will be in the minority,
an America
of the past. “Past” and “future” are
defined by beliefs, values, ethnicity and so many ways of defining and
distinguishing 2012 citizens from our nation’s demographic history.
What we learned in the year past is not
new, our country has seen this coming from centuries. This, in Lucille Clifton’s words, is “but the
half of it [we] do know.” We
are a diverse people, this is something our country has always been. While diversity has been part of the U.S. for hundreds of years, it has
finally reached a place where it can no longer be ignored or dismissed as of little or
no consequence (which is easy to do from places of power or isolation). We, as a nation, I believe, must now
recognize that there are consequences to the depth of diversity that is (and always has
been) our nation. We need to say more than " We are all Americans." Yes we may be, and there is so much
more to say and do.
Let me reiterate: We have always been a
diverse nation. Diversity is part of who
we are as the United States. As our diversity has grown, the differences
have become striking and shaping. In
recent decades, these differences have accelerated and many - including disappointed
candidates and their supporters - were lost in the gap between a distant past
and an emerging future. And now we are
long overdue in becoming collectively intentional about focusing our attention
and direction on our diversity. This is
called pluralism: while diversity happens (after all, the
human race is diverse), pluralism - learning to live with (and celebrate)
diversity – is intentional. Right now,
it seems to me, we are struggling with being intentional. My sense is that individuals and institutions
(including Unitarian Universalism) are all struggling with what it means not
only to be diverse, but how to embrace and welcome pluralism.
Pluralism assumes an appreciation and
desire for individuality, but not individualism; life in the U.S. for the 21st
century will be about more than individual freedoms, freedoms often described
as “rights.” Some describe these
freedoms and rights as though they are intrinsic to being human, but many/most
of them are not. Most of these freedoms
and rights are found in laws and proclamations that were created by us, in a
particular time and space, and they can be tempered or even removed when
necessary. It seems to me that the
biggest challenge our nation and its institutions face is how to support
the common good, which may or may not support individual rights to which we
have grown accustomed. Might it be that
the belief in individual rights is rooted in diversity where the common good
grows from pluralism? If this question
is an important one to answer, then it begs an additional one: What rights are
you willing to moderate or relinquish in order to deepen the common good? It is my hope that these are questions we can
address together in 2013.
Take care and see you soon,
Fred
No comments:
Post a Comment